Show simple item record

dc.contributorDalseg, Rogeren_GB
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-11T10:42:26Z
dc.date.available2018-10-11T10:42:26Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier825
dc.identifier.isbn82-464-0733-3en_GB
dc.identifier.other2002/01050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12242/1478
dc.description.abstractIn KOSTMOD, a long-term defence plan costing tool developed for the Norwegian Defence, annual growth rates (TKF-rates) are applied to current cost estimates to predict future acquisition costs for different equipment categories. This is done to address the persistent phenomena of unit cost escalation, beyond inflation, from one generation of equipment to the next. The key issue is how to determine the appropriate cost escalation growth rate for a spesific weapon system. Historic acquisition costs from one generation to the next often carries a significant bias from cold war arms race mechanisms. Available cost estimates for future acquisitions are often too optimistic. Findings from data samples collected for this report reveals that rates found in British studies are too high for KOSTMOD use. However, British rates may still be used as an indicator for where on the scale a specific weapons system belongs. The report introduces a TKF decision matrix, a tool to determine an appropriate TKF growth rate for each equipment category in KOSTMOD. Updated TKF rates based on the matrix show a slight increase in the overall TKF level in KOSTMOD. This increase is consistent with findings from the data samples collected for this report.en_GB
dc.language.isonoben_GB
dc.titleTeknologisk fordyrelse i Forsvareten_GB
dc.subject.keywordForsvarsplanleggingen_GB
dc.subject.keywordKostnadsanalyseen_GB
dc.source.issue2002/01050en_GB
dc.source.pagenumber37en_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record